Wednesday, 30 November 2016
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Saturday, 26 November 2016
LAWuN Bar Tutes
The question behind the Bar Tutes ... ?
In the relentless pursuit of the perfect folio too much is hidden and the creative power tool of doubt is suppressed ?
Not a crit ?.
Not
an assessment but an exchange of ideas as prompted by the work of two
brave students in an informal noisy open context ... no finished work ,
the work is never finished ! All work is provisional , even for
Duchamp ? Discuss !
This is non - announcement .
W a l l V A R I A T I O N
N U M B E R F O U R
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
Sunday, 20 November 2016
open source conversations
There are too many buildings and not enough time-based strategies for the provision of sustainable enclosures for learning !!
Friday, 18 November 2016
Thursday, 17 November 2016
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
AALAWuN 840 hours
You may not be aware but AALAWuN is in control of the walls of the AA bar till the end of term .
840 hours of unnanounced wall variations
Can you contribute with your students/ comrades to the 840 hours of variations on the walls and converstaions by responding to the attached information and by submitting a beautifully designed poster of your ideas to me Manijeh or Eddie for printing at say A1 for the walls ? .... but soon ?
The world is full of answers , but what was the question ?
AALAWuN ... all information is provisional
AALAWuN 840 hours
Thinkingf abiout the design of your education .
840 hours of unnanounced wall variations
Can you contribute with your students/ comrades to the 840 hours of variations on the walls and converstaions by responding to the attached information and by submitting a beautifully designed poster of your ideas to me Manijeh or Eddie for printing at say A1 for the walls ? .... but soon ?
The world is full of answers , but what was the question ?
AALAWuN ... all information is provisional
AALAWuN 840 hours
Thinkingf abiout the design of your education .
Monday, 14 November 2016
Friday, 11 November 2016
LAWuN - 840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
Now that is a strange and beautiful journey .... from a wall and an egg in WC1 , to a film , to Elgar ................ where next ?
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
840 hours unannounced wall variations
Thursday, 3 November 2016
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
LAWuN - Illich
Ivan Illich has
argued for the creation of convivial, rather than manipulative
institutions. Conviviality involves 'autonomous and creative
intercourse among persons, and the intercourse of persons with their
environment' (ibid.: 24). In convivial institutions (and the
societies they make up) modern technologies serve 'politically
interrelated individuals rather than managers'. (Illich 1975: 12).
Such institutions are characterized by 'their vocation of service to
society, by spontaneous use of and voluntary participation in them by
all members of society (Gajardo 1994: 716). In many respects, Ivan
Illich is echoing here the arguments of earlier writers like Basil
Yeaxlee who recognized the power of association and the importance of
local groups and networks in opening up and sustaining learning.
However, he takes this a stage further by explicitly advocating new
forms of formal educational institutions. He also recognizes that the
character of other institutions and arrangements need to be changed
if the 'radical monopoly' of schooling is to be overturned.
Learning webs - new
formal educational institutions. In Deschooling Society Ivan Illich
argued that a good education system should have three purposes: to
provide all that want to learn with access to resources at any time
in their lives; make it possible for all who want to share knowledge
etc. to find those who want to learn it from them; and to create
opportunities for those who want to present an issue to the public to
make their arguments known (1973a: 78). He suggests that four
(possibly even three, he says) distinct channels or learning
exchanges could facilitate this. These he calls educational or
learning webs.
Exhibit 1: Ivan
Illich on learning webs
Educational
resources are usually labelled according to educators curricular
goals. I propose to do the contrary, to label four different
approaches which enable the student to gain access to any educational
resource which may help him to define and achieve his own goals:
1. Reference
services to educational objects - which facilitate access to things
or processes used for formal learning. Some of these things can be
reserved for this purpose, stored in libraries, rental agencies,
laboratories and showrooms like museums and theatres; others can be
in daily use in factories, airports or on farms, but made available
to students as apprentices or on off-hours.
2. Skill exchanges -
which permit persons to list their skills, the conditions under which
they are willing to serve as models for others who want to learn
these skills, and the addresses at which they can be reached.
3. Peer-matching - a
communications network which permits persons to describe the learning
activity in which they wish to engage, in the hope of finding a
partner for the inquiry.
4. Reference
services to educators-at-large - who can be listed in a directory
giving the addresses and self-descriptions of professionals,
paraprofessionals and freelances, along with conditions of access to
their services. Such educators... could be chosen by polling or
consulting their former clients. (Illich 1973a: 81)
Such an approach to
educational provision found some enthusiastic proponents within
non-formal education (see, for example, the work of Paul Fordham et.
al.1979). More recently, such themes have appeared in a somewhat
sanitized form in some policy pronouncements around lifelong learning
and the so-called learning society. Writers like Leadbeater (2000:
112) have rediscovered Ivan Illich and argued for a partially
deschooled society: 'More learning should be done at home, in offices
and kitchens, in the contexts where knowledge is deployed to solve
problems and to add value to people's lives'. However, there can be a
cost in this. The reference to 'adding value' hints at this. As Ivan
Illich himself argued, 'educators freed from the restraint of schools
could be much more effective and deadly conditioners' (Illich 1975:
74). Without a full realization of the political and ethical
dimensions of conviviality, what can happen is not so much
de-schooling but re-schooling. The activities of daily life become
more deeply penetrated by commodification and the economic and social
arrangements it entails. Learning becomes branded (Klein 2001:
87-105) and our social and political processes dominated by the
requirements of corporations (Monboit 2001).
Informal education -
changing the character of other institutions and formations. Ivan
Illich argues for changes to all institutions so that they may be
more convivial for learning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)